We aim to be a voice in the ongoing political discourse, providing both factual information and opinionated analysis, from a progressive or center-left perspective, free from the direct influence of major established Main Street Media.
Blue Press Journal – In a rare display of bipartisan pushback against President Trump’s trade policies, the Senate voted to block tariffs on Brazil, with five Republicans joining every Democrat in support of the resolution. The legislation, which would terminate the national emergencies declared by Trump to justify 50% tariffs on Brazil, aims to mitigate the impact of these tariffs on American consumers.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York slammed Trump’s tariffs, stating, “Every American who wakes up in the morning to get a cup of java is paying a price for Donald Trump’s reckless, ridiculous, and almost childish tariffs.” The tariffs, which affect coffee imports from Brazil, have led to increased prices for American coffee lovers.
The vote demonstrated a notable split within the Republican Party, with Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina defying the President’s stance on tariffs. However, despite this bipartisan support, the legislation is likely doomed due to the Republican-controlled House’s new rules, which allow leadership to prevent it from coming up for a vote.
Furthermore, even if the legislation were to pass Congress, Trump would almost certainly veto it. The President has linked the tariffs on Brazil to the country’s policies and criminal prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a move that has been widely criticized as an overreach of executive power.
The U.S. ran a $6.8 billion trade surplus with Brazil last year, according to the Census Bureau, making the tariffs a questionable economic decision. Democrats argue that the tariffs will only serve to harm American consumers and businesses, while failing to address the underlying trade issues with Brazil.
Blue Press Journal – In a shocking display of aggression, a federal immigration agent is accused of pointing a gun at a protesting citizen and making a chilling remark. According to a newly filed civil rights lawsuit, the agent, whose identity has not been released, allegedly brandished a gun at Chris Gentry, a combat veteran, while taunting him with the words “bang, bang” and “you’re dead liberal.”
Gentry, a combat veteran, was lawfully standing on the side of the road, public area, expressing his opposition to the agents’ presence, was exercising his constitutional right to free speech. However, the agent’s actions have raised serious concerns about the use of excessive force and the politicization of law enforcement.
This incident occurred in Chicago, a city that has become a focal point for controversy surrounding the Trump administration’s deployment of federal agents. Under the guise of a national crime-fighting initiative, the city has seen an influx of federal agents, sparking tensions with local residents and protesters.
The accused agent’s behavior is particularly disturbing, as it suggests a blatant disregard for the rights and safety of citizens. The use of a gun and the utterance of a death threat are unacceptable and have no place in law enforcement. Furthermore, the agent’s comment, “you’re dead liberal,” implies a level of partisan bias that is unbecoming of a federal agent.
This incident has sparked outrage and calls for accountability from civil rights groups and local officials. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Gentry, seeks damages and a thorough investigation into the incident.
As the nation faces police brutality and systemic racism, this incident highlights the need for greater transparency and oversight of law enforcement. The federal government must act swiftly to address these issues and uphold high standards of professionalism and respect for citizens’ rights.
Border patrol agents deployed tear gas on the 3700 block of North Kildare where residents say a landscape worker, a resident, and a woman on a bike were detained. Video from a resident. pic.twitter.com/cRgcaT4SrE
Blue Press Journal – The government shutdown has entered its second week, and the American public is growing increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress in resolving the crisis. While the effects of the shutdown become more apparent, President Donald Trump and most House Republicans are noticeably absent from the negotiations.
Trump, who has touted himself as a great deal maker, is currently in Asia, leaving many to wonder if he has any concerns for the American public. Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has opted to keep the lower chamber out of session this week, earning criticism for leading a “do nothing” Republican Congress.
The absence of Trump and House Republicans from the negotiations has drawn growing scrutiny. Senator Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) expressed his frustration during a CNBC interview on Monday, “How can I negotiate? The president is in Asia for five days. Johnson is basically keeping… the House of Representatives out until January to stop and protect pedophiles. So who am I negotiating with right now?”
Even some Republicans are criticizing Trump’s lack of engagement. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) told CNN’s Manu Raju, “I don’t know that we’ve ever had a shutdown… where the president was not engaged at the end. And so I think that that would certainly help.”
The shutdown has already started to take its toll on the economy, with hundreds of thousands of federal workers furloughed or working without pay. The longer the shutdown continues, the more severe the consequences will be. It is clear that the Republicans have no interest in governing, and their absence from the negotiations is a stark reminder of their priorities.
In a scathing editorial on Sunday, The Wall Street Journal criticized President Donald Trumpfor his reaction to an Ontario government ad that pushed back against his tariffs. The newspaper’s conservative editorial board declared that Trump was “wrong” on two counts and “shouldn’t get away” with his actions.
The controversy began when the Ontario government released an ad featuring a 1987 speech by Ronald Reagan, in which the former president warned about the dangers of tariffs. Trump responded by falsely calling the ad “fake,” declaring trade talks with Canada over, and slapping an extra 10% tariff on Canadian goods.
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board argued that Trump’s tariffs are doing economic damage by raising costs for consumers and businesses, and by dampening economic growth. “He has been fortunate that his tariffs haven’t triggered much retaliation, which has spared us from a global trade war,” the board wrote. “But the tariffs are doing economic damage… and by dampening animal spirits that should be soaring with his tax bill and deregulation.”
The editorial also took aim at Trump’s attempt to co-opt Reagan’s legacy on trade. “He can boast about tariffs all he wants,” the board concluded, “but he shouldn’t get away with taking Reagan’s trade beliefs in vain.” The Journal’s criticism is significant, given its conservative leaning and usual support for Republican policies.
The spat between Trump and Canada is the latest escalation in a trade dispute that has been simmering for months. Trump’s tariffs on Canadian goods, including steel and aluminum, have been met with retaliatory measures from Canada, which has imposed its own tariffs on American goods.
The Wall Street Journal’s criticism of Trump’s tariff policy is not isolated. Economists and business leaders warn that the tariffs will harm the US economy and raise consumer prices. As the trade dispute escalates, it remains to be seen if Trump will reconsider his trade policy. One thing is certain: The Wall Street Journal will hold him accountable.
The latest consumer price index (CPI) report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) paints a grim picture for working families in the United States. Prices rose at a 3% annual rate in September, the highest pace since the beginning of the year, with gas prices increasing by 4.1% last month. This surge in prices is having a devastating impact on consumer sentiment, which has fallen to a five-month low in October.
According to experts, the Trump administration’s tariff policies and the GOP’s inflationary budget law are responsible for the rising cost of living. Economic expert Dutta-Gupta stated, “This administration and Congress prioritize massive tax cuts for billionaires while making it harder for regular people to afford necessities.” The refusal to fund vital food assistance programs will only worsen the situation for struggling families.
The effects of the administration’s policies are far-reaching. As economist Heather Boushey noted, “High tariffs and ICE rounding up employees push prices upwards, while the lack of a coherent economic agenda threatens to push the economy into reverse.” These policies are impacting working families, who struggle to make ends meet as living costs rise.
The rising cost of food and gas is particularly concerning, as these are essential expenses that families cannot avoid. With food prices increasing by 0.2% in September, families are being forced to make difficult choices about how to allocate their limited budgets. The impact of these price increases will be felt disproportionately by low-income families, who already struggle to afford basic necessities.
The Trump administration’s policies are impacting working families, who face higher prices and difficulty making ends meet. By prioritizing billionaire donors over ordinary Americans, it’s clear they have no intention of addressing the issue. A change in economic policy is needed, one that focuses on the needs of working families and ensures access to basic necessities.
In a shocking departure from his “America First” trade agenda, President Trump has ignited a fierce battle with some of his most ardent supporters over U.S. beef prices. The controversy centers on Trump’s decision to quadruple the quota for tariff-free Argentinian beef, a move that has infuriated American cattle ranchers and certain GOP lawmakers.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a staunch Trump ally, slammed the decision on “The Tucker Carlson” show, stating, “I have no idea who is telling our great president… that this is a good idea. Because, honestly, it’s a punch in the gut to all of our American cattle ranchers, and they are furious and rightfully so.”
Trump’s rationale for importing Argentinian beef is to reduce prices in the U.S. while providing a financial lifeline to the struggling South American nation. The president has approved billions of dollars in aid for Argentina, aiming to bolster his ally, President Javier Milei, as he faces elections amidst an economic crisis.
However, this decision has sparked bipartisan criticism, particularly in light of the ongoing government shutdown, which has left thousands of military and federal workforce members without pay. The move has also drawn ire from American farmers and ranchers, who are already struggling with the consequences of Trump’s tariffs and immigration agenda.
Meriwether Farms, a Wyoming-based ranch, expressed its discontent on social media platform X, stating, “We love you and support you — but your suggestion to buy beef from Argentina to stabilize beef prices would be an absolute betrayal to the American cattle rancher.”
The American agriculture sector is facing rising material costs, including tariffs on fertilizers, and labor shortages due to Trump’s immigration policies. Trade partners have retaliated with their own taxes on American goods, worsening the challenges for U.S. farmers and ranchers.
As Trump’s decision sparks outrage, it remains to be seen how he will reconcile his “America First” agenda with the interests of loyal supporters and the agriculture sector. The feud over U.S. beef prices has exposed a deepening rift within the Trump administration’s trade policies.
Ford stated that the goal of the campaign was to “initiate a conversation about the kind of economy that Americans want to build and the impact of tariffs on workers and businesses.” He claimed that this goal had been achieved, as the ad had reached high levels of the US government. The decision to pull the ad was made after a discussion with the Prime Minister, with the aim of restarting trade negotiations.
It’s evident that Donald Trump isn’t driven by facts or what’s best for America when it comes to trade decisions; instead, he operates on the whims of his own inflated ego. In short, he comes across as nothing more than a petulant man-child.
Blue Press Journal – Since the second half of 2025, the U.S. economy has been teetering under the weight of President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade and fiscal policies—policies that were once hailed as pillars of a booming economy but now stand as key drivers of inflation, stagnating job growth, and mounting public discontent.
Despite repeated denials from the White House, data paints a troubling picture. Prices have risen steadily over the past several months, fueled in large part by the sweeping tariffs reimposed by the Trump administration. These tariffs, intended to protect domestic industries, have backfired—increasing the cost of imported goods and materials, which businesses are passing on to consumers. The result? A surge in inflation that is hitting American households where it hurts most.
“Tariffs are taxes—paid by consumers,” said Dr. Elsie Peng, research economist at Goldman Sachs. “The recent wave of import restrictions has created ripple effects across supply chains, contributing directly to climbing food and energy prices—two categories that disproportionately affect lower- and middle-income families.”
The upcoming consumer price index (CPI) report for September is expected to reflect this reality, with economists anticipating a notable uptick in inflation. Food prices alone have increased by 5.6% year-over-year, while energy costs have jumped nearly 12%, according to preliminary data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. For many Americans, these are non-negotiable expenses, leaving families with fewer options to adjust spending and maintain financial stability.
At the same time, the labor market is cooling at an alarming rate. Job growth, which averaged 150,000 new positions per month at the beginning of 2025, has plummeted to just 25,000 by August. Businesses, facing higher input costs and uncertain trade conditions, are scaling back hiring and freezing expansions.
“This slowdown isn’t random—it’s policy-driven,” Peng noted. “When uncertainty rises and costs climb, companies don’t invest, and they don’t hire. The private sector is responding rationally to an increasingly unstable economic environment.”
The consequences are tangible. Millions of Americans are now grappling with tighter budgets, stagnant wages, and shrinking opportunities. The unemployment rate, though not yet in crisis territory, has begun to climb, especially in manufacturing and export-dependent sectors.
Public sentiment has followed the same downward trajectory. A recent Quinnipiac University poll reveals that only 38% of voters approve of President Trump’s handling of the economy—the lowest approval rating since February 2017. That marks a nearly 20-point gap between approval and disapproval, a rare low for a president who staked his legacy on delivering an “unprecedented economic boom.”
“President Trump promised a vibrant and muscular economy,” said political analyst Maria Thompson. “But what voters are seeing now is a contraction of opportunity, not expansion. His policies are no longer delivering on their promises.”
While tax cuts and deregulation may have boosted corporate profits in the short term, the long-term toll of protectionist trade measures and erratic fiscal policy is becoming clear. Inflation is eroding purchasing power, job creation is stalling, and confidence in economic leadership is waning.
The American economy was once seen as resilient and adaptive. But when core economic policies prioritize political rhetoric over measurable results, the foundation cracks. Right now, that foundation is under serious strain.
As the nation faces economic turbulence, one fact is clear: sustainable growth cannot rely on tariffs, denial, and dwindling public trust. Ignoring this truth is already affecting grocery stores, job fairs, and households nationwide.
Blue Press Journal – As the world watches, the Trump administration is pushing forward with a plan to demolish a significant portion of the White House’s East Wing to make way for a $200 million ballroom. This egregious act of vandalism is not only a blatant disregard for the historic significance of the building but also a stark reflection of President Trump’s limited moral compass and prioritization of personal ego over national heritage.
The White House, often referred to as the “People’s House,” has been a symbol of American democracy and history for over two centuries. Its walls have borne witness to some of the most pivotal moments in the nation’s history, from the Civil War to the Civil Rights Movement. However, under the Trump administration, this sacred institution is being desecrated to accommodate the President’s desire for a grand, luxurious ballroom.
Historians and preservationists are outraged by this decision, and rightly so. As Edward Lengel, a historian and author, noted, “To me, the thing that’s shocking is not from the perspective of White House history and the building itself, it’s more changing the nature of the edifice, and what it represents goes counter to what the founders intended this to be. … They wanted it to be the people’s house.” The founders’ vision of the White House as a symbol of democracy and public service is being callously discarded to satisfy the President’s craving for opulence and self-aggrandizement.
The Society of Architectural Historians has also expressed its “great concern” over the ballroom project, stating that it should be subject to “a rigorous and deliberate design and review process.” However, the Trump administration has chosen to disregard these concerns, opting instead to fast-track the construction process. The excavators have already begun their work, tearing into the East Wing and sending parts of the roof, exterior, and interior crumbling to the ground.
This reckless pursuit of ego and luxury is a betrayal of the trust placed in the President to protect and preserve America’s national treasures. The White House is not a personal playground for the President and his family; it is a historic landmark that belongs to the American people. As such, any alterations or renovations should be undertaken with the utmost care and respect for the building’s significance and the principles it represents.
The demolition of the East Wing is not only a physical destruction of the White House but also a symbolic erosion of the values that America holds dear. It is a stark reminder that, under the Trump administration, the interests of the President and his cronies take precedence over the nation’s heritage and the well-being of its citizens.
As the ballroom construction continues, Americans must speak out against this act of vandalism. We must urge our leaders to prioritize the preservation of our heritage and protect historic landmarks. The White House is not a plaything for the President’s ego; it deserves our respect and care.
In the words of Lengel, “The thing that’s shocking is not from the perspective of White House history, but changing the nature of what it represents goes counter to what the founders intended.” We must preserve the White House as a symbol of democracy and public service, standing together to protect our national heritage and the principles of freedom, justice, and equality that America embodies.
The lawsuit argues that the House is depriving Arizona of its rightful representation in Congress, thereby impeding Grijalva’s ability to exercise her authority as a duly elected lawmaker. This is a clear infringement on the principles of democracy and the rights of the people of Arizona. Johnson’s reasoning for the delay – that he won’t swear in Grijalva until the House is back in regular legislative session – is nothing short of flimsy, especially considering he previously swore in two Republican House members under similar circumstances.
It’s no secret that Grijalva’s swearing-in is crucial, as she is expected to be the pivotal 218th vote for a petition that would force a vote on a bill pressing the Justice Department to release the Jeffrey Epstein files. Democrats have rightly accused Johnson of slow-walking her swearing-in to prevent this vote, an allegation he has denied. However, his actions speak louder than words, and it’s clear that his delay is a thinly veiled attempt to stifle the democratic process.
The people of Arizona deserve representation in Congress, and Grijalva must be sworn in immediately. The House of Representatives must not disenfranchise Arizona’s residents, and Johnson’s actions need accountability. The lawsuit by Mayes and Grijalva is essential to uphold the democratic process and protect the rights of Arizona’s citizens.
Speaker Mike Johnson’s delay of Grijalva’s swearing-in is a disregard for democracy and the rights of Arizona’s people. We must stand against this injustice and demand Grijalva’s immediate swearing-in. The people of Arizona deserve representation, and the House of Representatives must uphold its duty to ensure their voices are heard.
Blue Press Journal 