The recent Trump pardons of individuals who attacked law enforcement on January 6th, coupled with the lack of pushback from Republican leadership, paints a stark picture. The Republican Party can no longer lay claim to being the party of law and order; under Trump, it has become the party of lawlessness and disorder.
It is evident that Trump is anti-police. His actions speak louder than words and cannot be disputed. So, the question remains – do all police officers still support Trump and the deafening silence from the Republican Party? Do they possess the moral fortitude to hold their positions in light of these pardons? These are questions that must be asked and answered.
Our challenge to the American MEGA voters is this: if your beloved son, daughter, husband, or wife was courageously serving as a policeman and their brutal attacker was shockingly pardoned by the president … how would that make you feel?
President Donald Trump caused significant controversy on Monday night by granting extensive pardons to nearly all individuals charged in connection with the January 6 insurrection, thereby absolving them of their actions aimed at disrupting the certification of the 2020 presidential election results.
The FBI has categorized the violent clash as an act of domestic terrorism, resulting in injuries to approximately 140 law enforcement officials. On a national scale, over 1,500 individuals have faced federal charges related to this incident.
The pardons granted by Trump cover all remaining Jan. 6 defendants convicted of crimes related to the Capitol attack, providing them with a full, complete, and unconditional pardon. This move has been met with outrage and disbelief, particularly from those who were injured or lost their lives during the insurrection.
The weapons and objects used by the attackers on the Capitol grounds were truly terrifying, ranging from firearms and tasers to chemical sprays and sharp-edged weapons like knives, axes, and even a sword. Over 1,000 individuals have pleaded guilty in connection to the events of Jan. 6, with some facing misdemeanors and others facing felonies. Shockingly, 10 individuals were convicted of seditious conspiracy after contested trials.
As we witness this blatant abuse of power and the erosion of democracy, it is clear that the lawlessness has only just begun. We must brace ourselves for the challenges that lie ahead and pray for the safety of our nation as we navigate these turbulent times.
President-elect Donald Trump has made a bold and controversial promise to pardon those convicted of crimes related to the January 6th Capitol riot “in the first hour” of his new term. This announcement comes after Trump initially stated it would happen on “Day One.” Despite claims that President Joe Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter set the stage for this abuse of clemency, Trump’s promise of January 6th pardons was actually a cornerstone of his 2022 re-election campaign.
The burning question now is just how far Trump is willing to go with these pardons. Will he absolve those who violently attacked law enforcement officers, brutally assaulting them with baseball bats and fire extinguishers? Trump himself has indicated that he would. What about the masterminds behind the seditious conspiracy convictions? Will they also receive pardons?
The University of Maryland has identified more than 50 extremist groups that were present at the Capitol on that pivotal day, with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers at the forefront. In the aftermath of the insurrection, as the Justice Department intensified its efforts against their leadership, these groups experienced a significant decline in both membership and activity, with several ultimately disbanding entirely.
Numerous paramilitary groups are currently active along the southern border, apprehending migrants and handing them over to local authorities. Some even collaborate directly with law enforcement. It is not difficult to envision increased cooperation in the future, potentially involving federal agencies, particularly as the strain of mass deportations tests the government’s capabilities. Furthermore, it is not far-fetched to anticipate a rise in intimidation and violence, targeting events like Pride gatherings and protests, as well as journalists reporting on paramilitary activities, in an effort to suppress diversity and dissent.
As Trump prepares to wield his pardon power, the nation watches with bated breath to see how this controversial chapter in American history will unfold. The stakes are high, the tension palpable, and the consequences far-reaching. The drama continues to unfold as the fate of those involved in the January 6th insurrection hangs in the balance.
Since January 6th, militants have intensified their intimidation tactics at the local level, disrupting school board meetings and town council sessions. Incidents of threats and harassment against local officials have been steadily increasing, with over 600 recorded in 2024—double the number from 2022. A national survey in the last quarter of 2024 revealed that one in three school board members had been insulted, one in six harassed, and one in twelve threatened, leading to a decline in their willingness to continue their duties. Minorities and women have disproportionately borne the brunt of these attacks. However, militants may be realizing that while targeting school boards and town councils may yield a certain level of power, gaining positions within these institutions offers a different form of influence.
The sheer audacity and brilliance of pardoning individuals involved in an insurrection against the very democracy they claim to uphold is truly awe-inspiring. It warms the heart to see such a blatant disregard for the rule of law and the principles of democracy. It appears this will be Trumps way of governing, total disregard for the law, but of course is he not a convicted felon?
It is important to consider the implications of the incoming Trump administration’s statements regarding their intentions to target individuals in the media, the January 6 committee, and create an enemies list upon taking office.
If we take them at their word, these pardons would protect individuals who have exercised their first amendment rights and acted in what they believed to be the best interest of America. These individuals may face scrutiny from the new administration, including a potentially biased FBI director, and be at risk of government overreach and prosecution.
Therefore, pardons for individuals who have not been found guilty of any wrongdoing may be necessary to protect them from unjust persecution. Just as we immunize ourselves against the flu annually, these pardons would serve as a safeguard against the incoming administration’s potential efforts to unfairly target and prosecute individuals. It is crucial for Americans to be aware of these risks and take action to protect their rights.
White House Discussing Preemptive Pardons Of Trump’s Enemies: Reports. See link to story.
I had the pleasure of listening to Keth today, and let me tell you, he hit the nail on the head! It’s absolutely imperative that everyone tunes in to what he has to say.
The constant bickering between Republicans and Democrats is just laughable. Seriously, when Trump decided to pardon his son-in-law’s father, did anyone really bat an eye? It’s all just a big joke.
Biden went out of his way to avoid interfering with this prosecution, even though it cost his family a pretty penny. He didn’t remove or alter the Trump-appointed prosecutor handling the case, even when that prosecutor’s investigation was upgraded to special counsel status last year. That was a questionable move in its-self and demanded by republicans!!
Biden pointed out in his statement announcing the pardon, his son was unfairly targeted and prosecuted. The president rightly pointed out that people aren’t usually hauled into court on felony charges just for messing up a gun form, and those who pay their overdue taxes with interest and penalties due to serious addictions (like Hunter) typically get off with a slap on the wrist. But Hunter was treated differently to smear Biden and sabotage his election campaign, according to the president.
He’s got a point – but don’t just take my word for it. Trey Gowdy, a former House member and federal prosecutor, said on Fox News that there probably weren’t even ten cases nationwide of addicts or drug users getting prosecuted for possessing firearms or lying on applications. Senator Lindsey Graham also chimed in, saying the average American wouldn’t have been charged for the gun incident. These charges are so minor they wouldn’t have made it to court if Hunter Biden wasn’t, well, Hunter Biden.
To the republicans criticizing President Biden for this decision, take a step back and look at the bigger picture. A lot has changed since June when he said he wouldn’t pardon Hunter. Trump won the White House, not Biden or Kamala Harris, and the president-elect seems dead set on getting payback, with his nominations hinting at plans to weaponize the FBI and the Justice Department. He’s even talking about axing the current FBI director before his term ends and replacing him with Kash Patel, who’s vowed to “shake things up.” Oh, what a surprise!
Blue Press Journal 