Blue Press Journal

Tag: Jeffrey Epstein

  • House Republicans Reportedly Told Unreleased Epstein Files Are “Worse” for Trump

    DOJ tells Republicans that Epstein files even worse for Trump than they thought: report

    Blue Press Journal

    Washington, D.C. — Rumors are swirling among House Republicans that unreleased documents from late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could contain highly damaging material involving former President Donald Trump, according to a report from veteran journalist David Shuster. 

    Shuster, a former reporter for MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News, posted on X (formerly Twitter) that several GOP lawmakers had heard from Justice Department sources that the Epstein files include evidence far more compromising than previously known. 

    “A few GOP House members say they’ve heard from FBI/DOJ contacts that the Epstein files (with copies in different agencies) are worse than Michael Wolff’s description of Epstein photos showing Trump with half-naked teenage girls,” Shuster wrote. Wolff, an author known for controversial exposes on Trump, had previously claimed that Epstein’s safe contained compromising images involving the former president. 

    The speculation reportedly intensified after Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Trump ally, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee. During her testimony, Bondi refused to answer a question from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) about whether she had personally seen the photos seized from Epstein’s safe. Instead, she redirected by questioning Whitehouse about donations he received from LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, who has acknowledged ties to Epstein. 

    “She didn’t give a denial,” Shuster noted, adding that Bondi’s evasiveness had left some Republicans “spooked.” 

    The Epstein case remains a political controversy, with both major parties minimizing their ties to the disgraced financier. Epstein died in a federal jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges and had connections with numerous high-profile figures, including Trump, and Prince Andrew.

    Despite ongoing public pressure, the DOJ has resisted releasing the full cache of Epstein-related documents. If the claims circulating among GOP lawmakers are accurate, the unreleased files could reignite scrutiny of Trump’s past association with Epstein—a relationship the former president has previously dismissed as inconsequential. 

  • House Gains Momentum to Unseal Jeffrey Epstein Documents

    Blue Press Journal – In a significant development, the House of Representatives has finally garnered the necessary support to demand the release of documents related to the late financier and convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. The momentum shift came after Democrat Adelita Grijalva’s victory in the special election for Arizona’s 7th District on Tuesday. Grijalva’s win is expected to tip the scales in favor of transparency, as she has pledged to sign a petition calling for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to unseal the Epstein files.

    The petition, which now boasts 218 signatures, crosses party lines, with a handful of Republicans joining their Democratic counterparts in demanding accountability. The magic number of 218 signatures is crucial, as it triggers a vote on the matter. While it is uncertain whether President Donald Trump’s DOJ will comply with the request, the mounting pressure from lawmakers may ultimately lead to the release of the long-sought documents.

    Epstein, a onetime close friend of President Trump, was embroiled in a high-profile sex trafficking scandal before his death in August 2019. The DOJ’s handling of the case has been shrouded in controversy, with many questioning the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death and the extent of his connections to powerful figures.

  • Epstein Victims Demand Transparency: Call on Trump Administration to Release Files in Full

    In a powerful and emotional display, victims of convicted sexual offender Jeffrey Epstein gathered outside the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday to demand that the Trump administration release the Epstein files in their entirety. The press conference, attended by a large crowd of media, activists, and onlookers, marked a significant moment in the ongoing fight for justice and accountability in the Epstein case.

    Anouska De Georgiou, a woman who claims to have been abused by Epstein on his island in the Caribbean and elsewhere for years, spoke passionately about her experiences. “I am no longer weak, I am no longer powerless, and I am no longer alone,” she said. “And with your vote, neither will the next generation be.” De Georgiou directed her message to President Trump, urging him to use his influence and power to help the victims. “President Trump, you have so much influence and power in this situation. Please use that influence and power to help us,” she said.

    De Georgiou was joined by Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who have been leading the charge for transparency in the Epstein case. Massie emphasized that the Epstein scandal is not a hoax, but a real and serious issue that involves powerful and wealthy individuals who have been protected by their connections to the establishment in Washington, D.C. “This is not a hoax,” Massie said. “This is real. There are real survivors. There are real victims in this criminal enterprise, and the perpetrators are being protected because they’re rich and powerful and political donors to the establishment here in Washington, D.C.”

    The press conference also featured Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a major Trump ally, who joined the call for transparency and accountability. The presence of such a large and diverse crowd, including media, activists, and onlookers, suggests that the Trump administration’s efforts to bury the story will not succeed.

    One of the key issues at stake is the release of the Epstein files, which are currently being held by the Department of Justice (DOJ). While some pages have been released, they are heavily redacted, with some pages entirely blacked out. Massie criticized the DOJ’s handling of the documents, saying that they are allowing the department to “curate” the information that is being released. “If you’ve looked at the pages they’ve released so far, they’re heavily redacted,” Massie said. “Some pages are entirely redacted, and 97% of this is already in the public domain.”

    The victims who spoke on Wednesday repeatedly rejected Trump’s claim that the Epstein scandal is a hoax. Annie Farmer, who was abused by Epstein and made some of the earliest police reports about his conduct, called Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former associate, “a major architect” of Epstein’s trafficking and abuse. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking charges and is seeking a pardon from Trump.

    De Georgiou, who claims to have been abused by both Epstein and Maxwell, said that Maxwell’s potential pardon is a “nightmare” scenario. “This woman abused children,” De Georgiou said. “I was abused by Epstein and Maxwell for over 10 years, and she was present for some of my abuse. She was present, complicit and enabling. It’s one of my worst nightmares that she not only be transferred but the possibility that is very much going around that she might be pardoned. This is not OK.”

    The demand for transparency and accountability in the Epstein case is not going away. The victims and their supporters are determined to ensure that justice is served and that those responsible for the abuse and trafficking are held accountable. As De Georgiou said, “I am no longer weak, I am no longer powerless, and I am no longer alone.” The Epstein victims and their allies will continue to fight for the truth and for justice, and they will not be silenced.

  • New Revelations Spark Renewed Scrutiny of Epstein’s Death

    Blue Press Journal – In a shocking twist, newly surfaced testimony from Ghislaine Maxwell, the disgraced socialite and former associate of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has reignited concerns about the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death. During a July testimony, Maxwell explicitly stated that she does not believe Epstein died by suicide, fueling speculation about a potential murder-for-hire plot.

    The testimony that took place at a Florida prison where Maxwell was being held after receiving a 20-year sentence for her role in procuring victims for Epstein. Maxwell’s statements were made in response to Blanche’s inquiry about her thoughts on Epstein’s death. “I do not believe he died by suicide, no,” Maxwell replied, sparking renewed debate about the official narrative surrounding Epstein’s demise.

    Epstein’s death in 2019, while in jail during Donald Trump’s presidency, was initially ruled a suicide. However, many have questioned the official account, citing suspicious circumstances and inconsistencies in the investigation. Early this year it was noted there was almost 3 minutes missing in the security camera footage of his death.

    Mark Epstein, Jeffrey’s brother, has also cast doubt on the suicide ruling, citing a pathologist who claimed that the marks on Epstein’s body were more consistent with homicide than suicide.

    The transfer of Maxwell to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas after her testimony has also raised eyebrows, as sex offenders like Maxwell are typically not eligible for such facilities without a waiver from the Department of Justice.

    With many questions still unanswered, it remains to be seen whether the truth about Epstein’s death will ever be fully revealed. One thing is certain, however: the public deserves a more comprehensive and transparent accounting of the events surrounding this high-profile case.

  • “Suspicious” Exchange Between Ghislaine Maxwell and DOJ Raises Eyebrows

    Blue Press Journal – A recent audio recording and transcript of a two-day meeting between Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice, and the Department of Justice has sparked concern among former FBI officials. The exchange, which took place in 2020, has been described as “curious” and “suspicious” by Andrew McCabe, a former FBI deputy director.

    During the interview, Maxwell brought up President Donald Trump’s name unprompted, referring to him in glowing terms and addressing him as “president” rather than by his actual name. This unusual display of respect and admiration has raised questions about Maxwell’s motives and whether she was attempting to curry favor with the President.

    McCabe noted that Maxwell’s behavior was “not a coincidence” and that her repeated references to Trump as “president” were likely a deliberate attempt to ingratiate herself with him. This theory is further supported by rumors that Maxwell is seeking a pardon from the President.

    What’s more, the interview itself was conducted under unusual circumstances, with no line agents or investigators present to serve as witnesses. This lack of transparency and oversight has led many to speculate that the meeting was staged to allow Maxwell to perform for Trump’s benefit.

    The exchange raises serious questions about the integrity of the Justice Department’s dealings with Maxwell, who sought to appeal to Trump’s ego for a pardon instead of genuinely cooperating with the government.

    This debacle exemplifies the political manipulation and backroom dealing characterizing the Trump administration. Maxwell’s use of the interview to flatter the President and possibly secure a pardon is a slap in the face to the justice system and Epstein’s victims.

  • Epstein Victims’ Lawyer Slams Trump DOJ’s Handling of Ghislaine Maxwell Case as “Appalling”

    Blue Press Journal (NYC) – In a scathing critique, Arick Fudali, an attorney representing seven accusers of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has condemned the Trump Department of Justice’s (DOJ) handling of Ghislaine Maxwell’s case as “reeking of suspicion.” Maxwell, a longtime associate of Epstein, has been accused of playing a crucial role in his sex trafficking ring.

    Fudali expressed outrage over the “special treatment” being afforded to Maxwell, stating that she should be facing the most severe possible punishment for her alleged crimes. “The fact that she has gotten anything but the most severe possible punishment is an absolute travesty of justice,” he said. “She should be in the maximum security prison where child sex traffickers belong.” Fudali’s comments come as many of Epstein’s victims and their advocates continue to demand justice and transparency in the case.

    The attorney also called on the Trump administration to release all files related to the Epstein case, with the names of the victims redacted, to ensure transparency and accountability. “The easiest step for the Trump administration would be to just release the files, redact the names of the victims, release the entire files to the public,” he said. “Anything short of that is suspicious. Anything short of that is not enough.”

    Fudali’s criticisms reflect the growing frustration and mistrust among Epstein’s victims and their supporters, who feel that the DOJ’s handling of the case has been inadequate and overly secretive. The Trump administration’s response to the Epstein scandal has been widely criticized, with many accusing the government of prioritizing the interests of the wealthy and powerful over those of the victims.

  • Judge Scolds Trump Administration for Withholding Epstein Documents

    Blue Press Journal (DC) – In a stinging rebuke, Judge Richard Berman has criticized the Trump administration for refusing to release over 100,000 pages of documents related to the investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The judge’s blistering opinion comes as a grand jury motion was filed to unseal the documents, which the government has thus far refused to disclose.

    Judge Berman argued that the government is the logical party to make a comprehensive disclosure to the public, stating that the current grand jury motion appears to be a “diversion” from the broader scope of the Epstein files in the government’s possession. He emphasized that the law is clear on this issue, with few exceptions allowing for the release of grand jury materials.

    The judge noted that the Justice Department has the full authority to release the documents, which were compiled during its investigation into Epstein. By withholding these documents, the administration is denying the public access to crucial information about the case. This decision has sparked widespread criticism, with many arguing that the government is prioritizing secrecy over transparency.

    The Trump administration’s refusal to release the documents has raised concerns about the government’s commitment to accountability and openness. Attorney General Pam Bondi, who has been instrumental in the administration’s handling of the Epstein case, has faced intense scrutiny for her role in withholding the documents.

    Judge Berman’s opinion serves as a stark reminder of the importance of government transparency, particularly in high-profile cases like Epstein’s. The public has a right to know the truth about the government’s investigation and any potential wrongdoing that may have occurred. By withholding these documents, the Trump administration is undermining this right and perpetuating a culture of secrecy.

    One thing is certain, however: Judge Berman’s scathing opinion has sent a clear message to the Trump administration that its attempts to withhold information from the public will not go unchallenged.

  • Former Prosecutor Accuses Bill Barr of Helping Trump “Cover Up” Epstein Scandal

    Blue Press Journal (DC) – In a shocking revelation, a former prosecutor from the Southern District of New York has come forward to accuse former Attorney General Bill Barr of helping President Donald Trump “cover up” his involvement in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. The prosecutor, who worked under U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Berman, claims that Barr had no knowledge of the investigation or prosecution of Epstein, despite his claims to the contrary.

    During a testimony before the House Oversight Committee on Monday, Barr stated that he was unaware of any information that might implicate Trump in the Epstein case. However, this statement has been called into question by the former prosecutor, who pointed out that Barr was never briefed on the investigation and had no reason to review the Epstein file.

    According to the prosecutor, Berman had intentionally kept Barr at arm’s length, as the charges being sought did not require main justice approval. This is unusual for a high-profile investigation like the Epstein case, and suggests that Berman may have been trying to limit Barr’s involvement.

    The former prosecutor, who spoke to MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, stated that if Barr didn’t review the file and wasn’t briefed on the investigation, then his claims of not seeing anything that might implicate Trump are meaningless. The prosecutor also criticized the House Oversight Committee for not calling in line prosecutors who worked on the case, suggesting that they are more interested in protecting Trump than in getting to the bottom of the scandal.

    The accusations against Barr come after it was revealed in May that the Department of Justice had informed him that Trump’s name was mentioned in the Epstein files. This revelation has raised questions about Barr’s credibility and his role in potentially covering up Trump’s involvement in the scandal.

    The former prosecutor’s accusations add to ongoing criticisms of Barr’s handling of the Epstein case, which has ignited calls for transparency and accountability. As the investigation unfolds, it remains uncertain if the truth about Trump’s involvement will be revealed. The American public deserves to know the truth, and it’s time for those in power to stop covering it up.

  • The Emerging Voices of Epstein’s Victims: A New Threat to the Trump Administration

    Blue Press Journal (DC): A long-suppressed but now emerging chorus of voices from the victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse is gaining momentum, and it could have significant implications for President Donald Trump and his aides. These women, who have been let down by the government at multiple levels, are finally finding the courage to speak out, and their stories could further fuel the scandal surrounding the Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein case.

    The victims of Epstein’s abuse, as well as their families, have been traumatized for years, and the government’s failure to protect them has only added to their suffering. The trauma caused by abuse can be passed down through generations, making it a long-lasting and devastating impact on those affected. Despite this, the Trump administration has refused to release files about Epstein’s life, which could shed light on the circumstances surrounding his abuse and the potential involvement of high-profile figures.

    According to CNN, Attorney General Pam Bondi briefed President Trump in May that his name was mentioned in the files, along with other prominent individuals. However, Trump has never been investigated or charged in connection with Epstein, whom he knew in the 1990s and early 2000s. The White House claims that Trump threw Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago resort because he was “a creep,” but this explanation raises more questions than it answers.

    The Trump administration’s handling of the Epstein crisis has been criticized for its lack of transparency and empathy towards the victims. In a recent meeting at the White House, which was intended to address the crisis, there were no representatives from the Epstein survivor community in attendance. Instead, the meeting was attended by Vice President JD Vance, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and FBI Director Kash Patel, among others. The meeting was initially scheduled to take place at the vice president’s residence but was moved to the White House due to the intense media scrutiny.

    The absence of Epstein survivors from the meeting is a telling sign of the administration’s priorities. By excluding the very people who have been most affected by Epstein’s abuse, the administration is sending a clear message that it is more interested in managing the crisis than in providing support and justice to the victims. This approach is not only insensitive but also potentially counterproductive, as it may further galvanize the public’s perception that the administration is trying to cover up its involvement in the scandal.

    As the chilling testimonies of Epstein’s victims surge forth, the Trump administration finds itself under an escalating barrage of demands to confront its troubling past. Trump’s blatant refusal to divulge critical files screams of a cover-up, feeding the public’s festering distrust. How will they squirm out of this tightening noose of accountability? One thing is crystal clear: Trump’s stubborn refusal to release the Epstein-related inquiries raises eyebrows and begs the question—what dark secrets is he trying to safeguard?

  • The Complex and Troubling History of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein’s Relationship

    From left, American real estate developer Donald Trump and his girlfriend (and future wife), former model Melania Knauss, financier (and future convicted sex offender) Jeffrey Epstein, and British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell pose together at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000. (Photo by Davidoff Studios/Getty Images)

    Blue Press Journal: Before Jeffrey Epstein’s conviction as a sex offender and Donald Trump’s presidency, the two men socialized in elite circles, attending lavish parties and traveling together on Epstein’s private jet. Their friendship, which dated back to the early 2000s, was marked by a shared affinity for beautiful women, with Trump once describing Epstein as a “terrific guy” in a 2002 interview with New York Magazine.

    However, their relationship was not without its tensions. In recent years, Trump has attempted to distance himself from Epstein, claiming that he had kicked him out of his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, due to his allegedly creepy behavior. On July 23, White House communications director Steven Cheung told CNN that Trump had barred Epstein from the resort, citing his unacceptable conduct.

    Trump later elaborated on the reason for the rift, stating that Epstein had “stolen” young women who worked at his Mar-a-Lago spa, including Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s accusers. Giuffre had worked at the spa, and Trump claimed that Epstein had poached her from him. This revelation has raised questions about Trump’s knowledge of Epstein’s predatory behavior and his role in enabling it. Also why was Trump hiring young (girls) women at his spa which was used by older men?

    According to some reports, the pair’s falling out occurred in late 2007, when Trump barred Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after he behaved inappropriately towards a teenager. This incident, as reported by journalists from the Miami Herald and Wall Street Journal, suggests that Trump was aware of Epstein’s problematic behavior towards minors as early as 2007.

    However, another factor may have contributed to the end of their friendship: a bitter dispute over a Palm Beach oceanfront mansion. In 2004, Trump and Epstein engaged in a heated bidding war over the property, which ultimately drove a wedge between them. This incident, reported by The Washington Post in 2019, occurred just months before Palm Beach police began investigating allegations of Epstein’s sexual abuse of minors.

    The complex and troubling history of Trump and Epstein’s relationship raises significant skepticism regarding the former president’s judgment and potential complicity in enabling Epstein’s crimes. One can’t help but question how Trump could remain oblivious to what was happening, given their apparent closeness. While Trump tries to downplay their friendship and create distance from Epstein’s actions, the evidence seems to point to a relationship that was not only closer but also far more problematic than he cares to admit.

    Trump’s connection to the disgraced financier remains a subject of intense scrutiny. While the president has attempted to downplay their relationship, the evidence suggests that their friendship was marked by a troubling pattern of behavior and exploitation. As more information comes to light, it is clear that the complex and disturbing history of Trump and Epstein’s friendship will continue to be a major focus of attention and concern, which by the way Trump is trying to cover up!