Blue Press Journal

Tag: trump

  • Bernie Sanders Calls for RFK Jr’s Resignation as Health Secretary

    Blue Press Journal – In a scathing op-ed published in the New York Times, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has demanded that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. step down as the US Health Secretary, citing his “dangerous” policies that are “endangering the health of the American people.” Sanders’ call for Kennedy’s resignation comes amid growing public outcry and chaos within US health agencies.

    According to Sanders, the Trump administration’s actions under Kennedy’s leadership have been detrimental to the nation’s health, despite their slogan of “Make America Healthy Again.” The senator pointed to the recent firing of Susan Monarez, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the subsequent resignation of four other top CDC officials in protest. These officials reportedly refused to support Kennedy’s “dangerous policies,” which have been widely criticized by the medical community.

    Sanders criticized Kennedy’s long-standing crusade against vaccines and his advocacy of conspiracy theories that have been repeatedly rejected by scientific experts. The senator argued that Kennedy’s actions will make it more difficult for Americans to access lifesaving vaccines, exacerbating the nation’s already “broken healthcare system.”

    The controversy surrounding Kennedy’s leadership has raised concerns among healthcare professionals and the public. As the head of the US health department, his policies impact the nation’s health. Sanders’ call for his resignation underscores the urgency to ensure health agencies are led by those who prioritize science and public health.

  • Trump’s Tariffs Dealt Significant Blow as Federal Appeals Court Rules Them “Basically All Illegal”

    Blue Press Journal (DC) – In a major setback for the Trump administration, a federal appeals court has invalidated vast portions of the president’s sweeping tariffs, ruling that he lacked the authority to impose them under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. The 7-4 decision, which upholds a lower court’s opinion, marks a significant defeat for Trump’s global trade war.

    The appellate court’s majority found that Trump’s argument, which relied on declarations of national emergencies to establish the power to enact wide-ranging taxes, was “a wafer-thin reed on which to rest such sweeping power.” The judges concluded that Trump unlawfully stretched the 1977 statute to impose the import tariffs, which affects nearly all goods from nearly every country importing to the United States.

    This ruling has significant implications, as it may require the administration to repay billions of dollars in duties, a move that customs and trade experts warn would be “a logistical nightmare.” The court emphasized that “tariffs are a core congressional power” and that there is “no clear congressional authorization by IEEPA for tariffs of the magnitude of the reciprocal tariffs and trafficking tariffs.”

    The decision affirms a May ruling from the US Court of International Trade, which also found that Trump exceeded his authority. This latest ruling is a major blow to Trump’s trade policies, which have been widely criticized for their potential to harm American businesses and consumers.

  • Federal Appeals Court Deals Blow to Trump’s Tariff Policy

    Blue Press Journal – In a significant setback to President Trump’s trade agenda, a federal appeals court rejected his claim that emergency powers justify imposing tariffs on a global scale. On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled 7-4 that the President’s tariffs were not authorized by the statute he cited to justify them.

    The court’s decision affirms a lower court’s ruling that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not permit the President’s sweeping moves. The IEEPA allows the President to issue certain economic sanctions in response to an “unusual and extraordinary threat” during an emergency. However, the court ruled that this authority does not extend to the imposition of tariffs.

    The majority opinion stated, “Because we agree that IEEPA’s grant of presidential authority to ‘regulate’ imports does not authorize the tariffs imposed by the Executive Orders, we affirm.” This decision is a significant blow to the Trump administration’s efforts to refashion global trade through tariffs.

    The ruling will not take effect immediately, as the court has withheld the mandate for its decision until October 14. This delay allows the administration to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. The Trump administration is likely to pursue an appeal, as the tariffs are a key component of the President’s trade policy.

    This decision has significant implications for ongoing trade disputes between the United States and other countries. The Trump administration’s tariffs on goods from several nations, including China, Canada, and Mexico, were justified by national security concerns and unfair trade practices. The court’s ruling suggests these tariffs may not be legally justified, potentially leading to a re-evaluation of the administration’s trade policy.

  • Stupid is as Stupid does… TRUMP Tariffs

    BLUE PRESS JOURNAL – In a move that is set to infuriate Americans and disproportionately harm his core base, President Donald Trump is eliminating the de minimis rule, a century-old exemption that allowed goods valued at $800 or less to enter the United States duty-free. This policy change, which takes effect on Friday, will subject approximately 1.4 billion packages to tariffs ranging from 10-50% or flat fees of $80, $160, or $200 per package.

    The de minimis rule was designed to facilitate trade in low-value items, reduce customs paperwork, and keep the mail moving efficiently. However, with its elimination, Trump’s latest tariff will have a devastating impact on low-wage earners and young voters, two groups that were crucial to his election victory. These demographics, which have been loyal to Trump, will now face significant price hikes on everyday items, including online purchases and gifts.

    The numbers are stark, and the consequences will be far-reaching. The tariffs will not only increase costs for consumers but also burden small businesses and e-commerce platforms that rely on international trade. The move is a stark reminder of Trump’s failed promise to bring prices down “on Day 1” of his presidency. Instead, his policies have consistently driven prices up, hurting the very people who voted for him.

    The timing of this policy change could not be worse for Trump, whose job approval ratings have been steadily declining. The elimination of the de minimis exemption will likely drive a stake deep into the heart of his already struggling ratings. Voters, who were initially swayed by Trump’s promises of pain-free tariffs paid by other countries, are now facing the harsh reality of his policies. As they begin to feel the pinch of higher prices, they will undoubtedly reevaluate their support for the president.

    Trump’s latest tariff is a self-inflicted wound that will have far-reaching consequences for his base and the American economy as a whole. As the saying goes, “stupid is as stupid does,” and this policy change is a prime example of the administration’s tone-deaf approach to trade and economics. With the midterm elections looming, it remains to be seen how voters will respond to this latest affront to their wallets. One thing is certain, however: Trump’s approval ratings will continue to suffer as the full weight of his tariffs becomes apparent to the American people.

  • Trump Administration Sparks Outrage with Sudden Firing of CDC Director … MAKING AMERICA SICKER AGAIN

    BLUE PRESS JOURNAL (DC) – In a shocking move, the Trump Administration has fired Dr. Susan Monarez, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), just one month after her Senate confirmation. The reason behind her termination has left many in the medical community stunned and concerned about the safety of the American people.

    According to White House officials, Dr. Monarez was let go because she did not share President Trump’s “mission.” However, this vague explanation has only raised more questions. What mission could be more important than protecting the health and well-being of the American people? As one critic aptly put it, “Make America SICK” seems to be the real motto of the Trump Administration.

    Just a few months ago, President Trump praised Dr. Monarez’s “decades of experience championing Innovation, Transparency, and strong Public Health Systems.” He highlighted her impressive credentials, including a Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin and postdoctoral training in Microbiology and Immunology at Stanford University School of Medicine. So, what changed? Has the President’s judgment been clouded by his own personal biases or, as some speculate, by the early stages of dementia?

    The real reason behind Dr. Monarez’s firing appears to be her refusal to rubber-stamp vaccine policy written by a non-physician who doesn’t believe in vaccines – namely, RFK Jr., a notorious anti-vaxxer. This is a alarming development, especially as the country is bracing for the upcoming Covid-19 and flu season.

    The firing of Dr. Monarez has sparked widespread outrage among medical professionals and scientists, who fear that the Trump Administration is putting politics above public health. With RFK Jr. at the helm of the nation’s leading health agency, many are wondering if we can really feel safe. The answer, unfortunately, is a resounding no.

    As Professor of Medicine and Surgery, Dr. Jonathan Reiner, aptly put it, “Apparently, what Dr. Monarez did wrong was to refuse to rubber-stamp vaccine policy written by a non-physician who doesn’t believe in vaccines.” This is a chilling indictment of the Trump Administration’s priorities and a stark reminder that, under their watch, science and reason are being sacrificed at the altar of politics. As the nation prepares to face the challenges of the upcoming flu season, one thing is certain – our health and safety are no longer in good hands.

  • White House Flip-Flops on DC Crime Numbers

    In a stunning reversal, the White House is now embracing crime statistics in Washington D.C. that it previously dismissed as “fake” and “manipulated”. The sudden change of heart comes after President Donald Trump took control of the city’s police force, and the same data that was once deemed untrustworthy is now being touted as a success story for the administration.

    During a press briefing on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt highlighted the decline in crime rates, citing a 19% drop in total crime and a 30% drop in violent crime. She also pointed to significant reductions in homicides, robberies, car thefts, and assaults. However, this newfound enthusiasm for the data is at odds with the administration’s previous stance.

    Just months ago, President Trump was quick to discredit the same statistics, claiming that they were fabricated and that the city was actually becoming more violent. The trend of declining crime rates, which began before Trump’s takeover of the police force, was seen as inconvenient to his narrative of a city in chaos. National Democrats were swift to point out that violent crime had already fallen to a 30-year low, contradicting the President’s claims of a “violent hellscape”.

    The Council on Criminal Justice, a non-partisan think tank, has confirmed that crime rates in D.C. have indeed been declining since 2023, mirroring trends in other cities. However, the capital still experiences more violence than most cities. The White House’s sudden about-face on the data has raised eyebrows, with critics accusing the administration of cherry-picking statistics to suit its own agenda.

    This flip-flop is the latest example of the Trump administration’s selective use of data to advance its own narrative. By embracing statistics that were once deemed false, the White House is undermining its own credibility and raising questions about its commitment to accuracy and transparency. As the city continues to grapple with crime and public safety issues, it remains to be seen whether the administration’s newfound enthusiasm for the data will translate into meaningful policy initiatives or simply serve as a propaganda tool.

  • Fed Governor Lisa Cook Sues President Trump Over Removal Threat

    Blue Press Journal (DC) – In a courageous move, Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook has filed a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump, claiming that he has no authority to remove her from office. The lawsuit, filed on Thursday, argues that Trump’s announcement on August 25 to fire Cook violates a federal law that only allows the president to remove a Fed governor for cause.  “For cause” is generally understood to mean gross misconduct, such as malfeasance (wrongdoing), neglect of duty, or significant inefficiency while in office. 

    Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed’s governing body, was appointed by former President Joe Biden in 2022. Trump, a Republican, has accused Cook of committing mortgage fraud in 2021, a year before she joined the Fed. However, experts have questioned whether these transactions, which were public record at the time of her appointment and confirmation by the US Senate, constitute adequate cause for removal.

    The lawsuit raises concerns about the Fed’s independence from the White House in setting monetary policy, which may affect the global economy. Following Trump’s announcement to remove Cook, the US dollar weakened against major currencies.

    Cook’s lawyers argue Trump’s demands lack a proper basis or legal authority. Cook stated that “no causes exist under the law,” asserting that Trump has no power to remove her.

    This latest development has sparked concerns about Trump’s ongoing attempts to undermine the country’s checks and balances. Critics argue that Trump’s actions are a clear example of executive overreach, threatening the independence of institutions like the Federal Reserve.

  • The Hypocrisy of Trump’s Crime Crusade: Many Red States Cities Have Higher Crime Rates!!

    Blue Press Journal – As President Trump continues to push for a tougher stance on crime in Democratic cities, critics are pointing out the glaring omission of red states with equally high crime rates. The President’s threat to deploy National Guard troops to more American cities has sparked controversy, with many arguing that his focus on blue states is motivated by politics rather than a genuine concern for public safety.

    The data tells a different story. According to the FBI, some of the cities with the highest crime rates are actually located in red states, where Republican governors have been notably silent on the issue. Take Memphis, Tennessee, for example, which tops the list with a staggering 2,501 violent crimes per 100,000 people. Kansas City, Missouri, and Houston, Texas, also make the list, with 1,547 and 1,148 violent crimes per 100,000 people, respectively.

    CityStateViolent Crimes per 100,000 people
    MemphisTennessee2,501
    Kansas CityMissouri1,547
    HoustonTexas1,148
    NashvilleTennessee1,124

    As Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) noted, “It’s hypocritical for the President to focus on crime in Democratic cities while ignoring the same issues in red states. This is not a partisan issue; it’s a matter of public safety and justice for all Americans.”

    In contrast, cities like Washington, D.C., and Chicago, which have been targeted by Trump’s crime initiative, have actually seen significant decreases in crime rates. According to the Chicago Police Department, homicides in the city decreased by 11% in 2022, while Washington, D.C. saw a 10% decrease in violent crime.

    As the debate over crime and public safety continues, Trump’s focus on Democratic cities is misguided. By ignoring high crime rates in red states, the President fails to address the root causes of violence and perpetuates a partisan narrative that undermines society. It’s time for a new approach that prioritizes the safety and well-being of all Americans, regardless of political affiliation or location.

  • New Report Suggests Kennedy Center Honors Now Require Support for MAGA Politicians

    Blue Press Journal (DC) – A shocking revelation has emerged about the selection process for the prestigious Kennedy Center Honors, with a new report indicating that donations to Republican politicians who support former President Donald Trump’s MAGA agenda may be a prerequisite for receiving the award. The latest recipient to raise eyebrows is singer Gloria Gaynor, known for her iconic 1978 hit “I Will Survive,” which has been embraced by the LGBTQ community as an empowering anthem.

    According to Federal Election Commission records reviewed by MeidasTouch, Gaynor has made significant donations to several prominent Republicans, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Rep. Elise Stefanik, all of whom are staunch supporters of Trump’s policies. Additionally, she has contributed to the campaigns of Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Ohio gubernatorial hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy, who ran for the GOP presidential nomination in 2023 and early 2024.

    This discovery has sparked outrage and criticism, with many questioning the criteria for selecting honorees for the Kennedy Center awards. The implication that support for MAGA politicians is a requirement for the award is alarming, suggesting a politicized and biased selection process.

    The Kennedy Center Honors are intended to recognize individuals who have made significant contributions to the arts, and the selection process should be based on merit and artistic achievement, not political affiliation or donations to specific politicians. By prioritizing support for MAGA politicians, the awards risk losing their credibility and integrity.

    It remains to be seen how the Kennedy Center will address these allegations and whether they will ensure a fair selection process based on artistic merit instead of political influences. One thing is certain: the Kennedy Center Honors will never be viewed the same way again.

  • Joe Rogan Delivers Blow to Trump’s “Big Lie” Claim

    Blue Press Journal – In a shocking turn of events, podcast giant Joe Rogan has publicly challenged Donald Trump’s longstanding claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen. Rogan, who had previously endorsed Trump and hosted him on his show, joined comedian and commentator Dave Smith in questioning the validity of Trump’s assertions.

    During a recent episode of his podcast, Smith noted that Trump has consistently claimed that Joe Biden became president due to election cheating, yet has failed to provide concrete evidence to support this claim. “So I’m gonna need to know who ‘they’ is, and I’m going to need to know when we’re gonna see ’em perp-walked,” Smith said, highlighting the lack of accountability and transparency surrounding Trump’s allegations.

    Rogan interjected, stating, “I don’t think they have any evidence.” He went on to argue that if Trump or his team had credible proof of election tampering, they would have presented it by now. “If that was you or if that was me, and there was some reason why I knew that they did something, and I could give you all the facts, I would have that ready for anybody,” Rogan said. “For four fucking years they’ve been telling him he’s crazy for questioning the election. So after four years I’d have a fucking tight 10 minutes on the election where I could just rattle off at you and rock your world with it like, ‘These are the facts, Jack.’”

    Rogan’s comments are significant, as they come from a prominent figure sympathetic to Trump’s views. By questioning Trump’s claims, Rogan sends a powerful message to his audience, many likely influenced by his opinions. This may serve as a wake-up call for Trump’s supporters, who have clung to the “big lie” narrative for years.

    Rogan’s comments remind us that facts matter. By challenging Trump’s claims and demanding transparency, he is promoting a more informed discussion about American politics. Whether Trump’s supporters will listen is uncertain, but it’s clear Rogan has dealt a blow to the “big lie” narrative that won’t go unnoticed.