Blue Press Journal

Tag: trump

  • Tulsi Gabbard -will she really for us – the (US) ?

    The controversial 2017 meeting between former congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard and Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, as well as her previous statements regarding Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have come under renewed scrutiny following President-elect Donald Trump’s selection of her to lead America’s intelligence agencies.

    If confirmed as the US Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Gabbard would be entrusted with safeguarding the nation’s most critical secrets, overseeing 18 US intelligence agencies, and serving as a key advisor to the President.

    Can we truly risk the security of America by entrusting it to someone with such a vague stance on their allegiance to our country? It is imperative that we have unwavering loyalty and commitment to America in order to protect and defend our nation. Let us not gamble with the safety and well-being of our citizens by allowing uncertainty to cloud our judgment. The stakes are too high to ignore the importance of absolute dedication to our country.

  • Republicans and Musk are coming for your Social Security

    One thing that 80% of Americans can actually agree on is that Social Security benefits should not be slashed. However, Elon Musk is out here proposing to chop $2 trillion from the federal budget, which is a whopping 30% of spending. With Social Security being the big kahuna in the budget, it’s not looking too good for our retirement funds.

    Musk is all about sacrifices, not his, yours, claiming that everyone will have to tighten their belts under his reign. While Trump may not directly hack away at Social Security, or he might, his other schemes could indirectly lead to some snips here and there.

    The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy spilled the tea earlier this year, revealing that undocumented immigrants have actually been contributing $25 billion in Social Security taxes. So, if mass deportations go down, we could be saying goodbye to some serious cash flow. And according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, deportations, tariffs, and even Trump’s wild idea to nix income taxes on Social Security benefits could all spell trouble for the program’s finances. Looks like we might be facing a shortfall by 2031.

    By that time, Trump will be long gone, but you can bet your bottom dollar that Republicans will still be eyeing those scissors. And who knows, they just might get their way.

  • Pardons

    It is important to consider the implications of the incoming Trump administration’s statements regarding their intentions to target individuals in the media, the January 6 committee, and create an enemies list upon taking office.

    If we take them at their word, these pardons would protect individuals who have exercised their first amendment rights and acted in what they believed to be the best interest of America. These individuals may face scrutiny from the new administration, including a potentially biased FBI director, and be at risk of government overreach and prosecution.

    Therefore, pardons for individuals who have not been found guilty of any wrongdoing may be necessary to protect them from unjust persecution. Just as we immunize ourselves against the flu annually, these pardons would serve as a safeguard against the incoming administration’s potential efforts to unfairly target and prosecute individuals. It is crucial for Americans to be aware of these risks and take action to protect their rights.

    White House Discussing Preemptive Pardons Of Trump’s Enemies: Reports. See link to story.

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/biden-pardon-trump-enemies_n_67524196e4b0036b951e2465

    Bill Clinton backs president’s pardon of Hunter Biden

  • Justice – Really? Trump

    A jury of New Yorkers declared Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts in a case centered around a $130,000 payment to the actress Stormy Daniels just days before the 2016 presidential election. This payment was orchestrated by Trump’s personal attorney at the time, Michael Cohen, who was later repaid in monthly installments over the course of about a year. Looks like Trump’s shady dealings have finally caught up with him!

    Oh, but of course, did you not realize there are two distinct versions of justice? One tailored for the wealthy elite, such as Trump, and another for the rest of us common folk.

    It appears that Lady Justice is not actually blind, but rather conveniently blinded by the allure of money and the influence of politics. How surprising.

    Trump’s Lawyers Formally Ask Hush Money Judge To Dismiss Case

  • Keith Olbermann is right!

    I had the pleasure of listening to Keth today, and let me tell you, he hit the nail on the head! It’s absolutely imperative that everyone tunes in to what he has to say.

    The constant bickering between Republicans and Democrats is just laughable. Seriously, when Trump decided to pardon his son-in-law’s father, did anyone really bat an eye? It’s all just a big joke.

    THE PARDON IS ABOUT THE TRUMP MOB’S THREATS

  • You Can’t Make this Stuff up

    The shocking news broke today, Monday, that Pete Hegseth had quietly settled a financial dispute with a woman who accused him of harassment in 2017, President-elect Donald Trump decided to stick by his man and nominate him as the next Secretary of Defense. Trump’s trusty communications director, Steven Cheung, defended the decision by pointing out that Hegseth, despite the allegations, has not been formally charged with any crimes. “President Trump only selects the finest, most qualified individuals to join his administration,” Cheung declared with a straight face.

    However, Hegseth’s past actions before his gig as a Fox News TV host in 2017 paint a less-than-flattering picture of his character. Reports and testimonies from former colleagues reveal a troubling pattern of financial mismanagement, shady dealings, and questionable behavior that led to his ousting from not one, but two nonprofit organizations he headed—Veterans for Freedom and Concerned Veterans for America. It seems like Hegseth’s resume is more suited for a reality TV show than running the most powerful military force in the world. Read more here

  • The Bigger picture – Biden Pardon

    Biden went out of his way to avoid interfering with this prosecution, even though it cost his family a pretty penny. He didn’t remove or alter the Trump-appointed prosecutor handling the case, even when that prosecutor’s investigation was upgraded to special counsel status last year. That was a questionable move in its-self and demanded by republicans!!

    Biden pointed out in his statement announcing the pardon, his son was unfairly targeted and prosecuted. The president rightly pointed out that people aren’t usually hauled into court on felony charges just for messing up a gun form, and those who pay their overdue taxes with interest and penalties due to serious addictions (like Hunter) typically get off with a slap on the wrist. But Hunter was treated differently to smear Biden and sabotage his election campaign, according to the president.

    He’s got a point – but don’t just take my word for it. Trey Gowdy, a former House member and federal prosecutor, said on Fox News that there probably weren’t even ten cases nationwide of addicts or drug users getting prosecuted for possessing firearms or lying on applications. Senator Lindsey Graham also chimed in, saying the average American wouldn’t have been charged for the gun incident. These charges are so minor they wouldn’t have made it to court if Hunter Biden wasn’t, well, Hunter Biden.

    To the republicans criticizing President Biden for this decision, take a step back and look at the bigger picture. A lot has changed since June when he said he wouldn’t pardon Hunter. Trump won the White House, not Biden or Kamala Harris, and the president-elect seems dead set on getting payback, with his nominations hinting at plans to weaponize the FBI and the Justice Department. He’s even talking about axing the current FBI director before his term ends and replacing him with Kash Patel, who’s vowed to “shake things up.” Oh, what a surprise!

  • The Effects of Tariffs on Imported Goods…the Trump Promise

    Understanding Tariffs

    Tariffs come in two primary forms: specific tariffs, which are a fixed fee per unit of imported goods, and ad valorem tariffs, which are a percentage of the value of the imported goods. These taxes can be levied for various reasons including protecting domestic industries, generating government revenue, and responding to unfair trade practices.

    Direct Effects on Prices

    One of the most immediate consequences of tariffs is the increase in prices for imported goods. When a government imposes a tariff, it raises the cost of these goods for importers. These costs are usually passed on to consumers, resulting in higher retail prices. For example, if a country imposes a 25% tariff on imported steel, the price of products using that steel—like cars and appliances—will also rise. This leads to inflationary pressures in the economy, affecting not just goods that are directly subject to tariffs, but potentially many related products as well.

    Impact on Domestic Markets

    Tariffs are often implemented to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. In the short term, this can benefit local producers, allowing them to maintain or increase their market share as consumers seek alternatives to more expensive imported goods. However, this protection can also lead to complacency among domestic producers, reducing their incentive to innovate or improve efficiency. Over time, failing to compete with foreign manufacturers can hinder the growth of a country’s industry.

    Additionally, while some sectors may thrive due to tariffs, others may suffer. Industries that rely on imported raw materials may see their costs rise, leading to higher production costs and reduced competitiveness. This creates a complex dance of winners and losers in the domestic market.

    In summary, Trump’s proposed tariffs will increase costs for the very people he vowed to help by lowering prices.

    Read more in the below article:

    We’re Economists. Here’s What We Really Think Of Trump’s Plan To ‘Lower’ Grocery Prices.