Appeals Court Upholds $83.3 Million Defamation Judgment Against Trump

Blue Press Journal (DC) – In a significant ruling, a federal appeals court has upheld a civil jury’s decision requiring former President Donald Trump to pay $83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll, a longtime advice columnist who accused him of sexual assault. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump’s appeal of the defamation award, finding that the “jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable.”

The decision stems from a trial last year in which a Manhattan jury found Trump liable for defamation and sexual assault. Carroll had accused Trump of sexually assaulting her in a Manhattan department store in 1996. Although the jury concluded that Trump had not committed rape as defined under New York law, they did find him liable for sexual assault and awarded Carroll $5 million in compensation for the alleged attack and Trump’s subsequent statements denying it.

The bulk of the $83.3 million award, however, was for defamation. The jury found that Trump’s repeated social media attacks against Carroll, in which he denied her allegations and questioned her credibility, constituted defamation. The appeals court upheld this finding, determining that Trump’s statements were not protected by the First Amendment and were, in fact, liable for damages.

The ruling is a victory for Carroll, who argues that Trump’s attacks harmed her character and credibility. It also sets a precedent for victims of sexual assault and defamation, emphasizing the need to hold powerful individuals accountable for their actions.

Trump’s lawyers had argued that the defamation award was excessive and that the jury’s findings were flawed. However, the appeals court rejected these arguments, finding that the jury’s decision was supported by the evidence and that the damages award was reasonable.

The case highlights the ongoing legal battles between Trump and his accusers. The former president has faced allegations of sexual misconduct and often uses social media to discredit them. The appeals court’s ruling underscores that such tactics can have serious consequences, affirming victims’ rights to seek justice and compensation.