Blue Press Journal

Tag: politics

  • No to Vaccine, Crowd Really?

    The rapid development of effective COVID vaccines in less than a year during the pandemic was a groundbreaking achievement in the long history of vaccination. It seemed like we were finally entering an era where we could protect ourselves against infectious diseases.

    But hold on a second! Just when we thought we were making progress, President-elect Donald Trump decides to nominate an antivaccine activist, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as the top health official in the nation. What could possibly go wrong, right?

    Now, we have infectious disease and public health experts warning us that we might be heading towards deadly epidemics of measles, whooping cough, meningitis, and even polio. All thanks to Kennedy and former House member Dave Weldon potentially leading the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    These two geniuses, Kennedy and Weldon, have decided to endorse debunked theories linking vaccines to autism and other chronic diseases. Because who needs reputable scientific studies when you have these guys spreading misinformation, right? And let’s not forget Weldon’s star appearances in antivaccine films after leaving Congress. Bravo, gentlemen, bravo.

    The president-elect also appeared open to the groundbreaking polio vaccine being “looked at.”

  • His decisions will have a direct impact on your health – RFK JR.

    The individual nominated to lead the Department of Health and Human Services should possess the necessary management and professional experience to effectively oversee one of the largest health agencies in the world. Their decisions will have a direct impact on the health of every American.

    Unfortunately, the current nominee chosen by President-elect Trump lacks these essential qualities. In fact, 77 Nobel Prize Winners have publicly opposed the appointment of RFK Jr.

    It is imperative that politics be set aside in this matter, as the primary focus should be on selecting a leader who prioritizes the health and well-being of the American people to effectively lead this agency.

    77 Nobel Prize Winners Write Message To The Senate: Don’t Confirm RFK Jr.

  • Tulsi Gabbard -will she really for us – the (US) ?

    The controversial 2017 meeting between former congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard and Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, as well as her previous statements regarding Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have come under renewed scrutiny following President-elect Donald Trump’s selection of her to lead America’s intelligence agencies.

    If confirmed as the US Director of National Intelligence (DNI), Gabbard would be entrusted with safeguarding the nation’s most critical secrets, overseeing 18 US intelligence agencies, and serving as a key advisor to the President.

    Can we truly risk the security of America by entrusting it to someone with such a vague stance on their allegiance to our country? It is imperative that we have unwavering loyalty and commitment to America in order to protect and defend our nation. Let us not gamble with the safety and well-being of our citizens by allowing uncertainty to cloud our judgment. The stakes are too high to ignore the importance of absolute dedication to our country.

  • Pardons

    It is important to consider the implications of the incoming Trump administration’s statements regarding their intentions to target individuals in the media, the January 6 committee, and create an enemies list upon taking office.

    If we take them at their word, these pardons would protect individuals who have exercised their first amendment rights and acted in what they believed to be the best interest of America. These individuals may face scrutiny from the new administration, including a potentially biased FBI director, and be at risk of government overreach and prosecution.

    Therefore, pardons for individuals who have not been found guilty of any wrongdoing may be necessary to protect them from unjust persecution. Just as we immunize ourselves against the flu annually, these pardons would serve as a safeguard against the incoming administration’s potential efforts to unfairly target and prosecute individuals. It is crucial for Americans to be aware of these risks and take action to protect their rights.

    White House Discussing Preemptive Pardons Of Trump’s Enemies: Reports. See link to story.

    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/biden-pardon-trump-enemies_n_67524196e4b0036b951e2465

    Bill Clinton backs president’s pardon of Hunter Biden

  • Justice – Really? Trump

    A jury of New Yorkers declared Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts in a case centered around a $130,000 payment to the actress Stormy Daniels just days before the 2016 presidential election. This payment was orchestrated by Trump’s personal attorney at the time, Michael Cohen, who was later repaid in monthly installments over the course of about a year. Looks like Trump’s shady dealings have finally caught up with him!

    Oh, but of course, did you not realize there are two distinct versions of justice? One tailored for the wealthy elite, such as Trump, and another for the rest of us common folk.

    It appears that Lady Justice is not actually blind, but rather conveniently blinded by the allure of money and the influence of politics. How surprising.

    Trump’s Lawyers Formally Ask Hush Money Judge To Dismiss Case

  • Keith Olbermann is right!

    I had the pleasure of listening to Keth today, and let me tell you, he hit the nail on the head! It’s absolutely imperative that everyone tunes in to what he has to say.

    The constant bickering between Republicans and Democrats is just laughable. Seriously, when Trump decided to pardon his son-in-law’s father, did anyone really bat an eye? It’s all just a big joke.

    THE PARDON IS ABOUT THE TRUMP MOB’S THREATS

  • The Bigger picture – Biden Pardon

    Biden went out of his way to avoid interfering with this prosecution, even though it cost his family a pretty penny. He didn’t remove or alter the Trump-appointed prosecutor handling the case, even when that prosecutor’s investigation was upgraded to special counsel status last year. That was a questionable move in its-self and demanded by republicans!!

    Biden pointed out in his statement announcing the pardon, his son was unfairly targeted and prosecuted. The president rightly pointed out that people aren’t usually hauled into court on felony charges just for messing up a gun form, and those who pay their overdue taxes with interest and penalties due to serious addictions (like Hunter) typically get off with a slap on the wrist. But Hunter was treated differently to smear Biden and sabotage his election campaign, according to the president.

    He’s got a point – but don’t just take my word for it. Trey Gowdy, a former House member and federal prosecutor, said on Fox News that there probably weren’t even ten cases nationwide of addicts or drug users getting prosecuted for possessing firearms or lying on applications. Senator Lindsey Graham also chimed in, saying the average American wouldn’t have been charged for the gun incident. These charges are so minor they wouldn’t have made it to court if Hunter Biden wasn’t, well, Hunter Biden.

    To the republicans criticizing President Biden for this decision, take a step back and look at the bigger picture. A lot has changed since June when he said he wouldn’t pardon Hunter. Trump won the White House, not Biden or Kamala Harris, and the president-elect seems dead set on getting payback, with his nominations hinting at plans to weaponize the FBI and the Justice Department. He’s even talking about axing the current FBI director before his term ends and replacing him with Kash Patel, who’s vowed to “shake things up.” Oh, what a surprise!

  • The Effects of Tariffs on Imported Goods…the Trump Promise

    Understanding Tariffs

    Tariffs come in two primary forms: specific tariffs, which are a fixed fee per unit of imported goods, and ad valorem tariffs, which are a percentage of the value of the imported goods. These taxes can be levied for various reasons including protecting domestic industries, generating government revenue, and responding to unfair trade practices.

    Direct Effects on Prices

    One of the most immediate consequences of tariffs is the increase in prices for imported goods. When a government imposes a tariff, it raises the cost of these goods for importers. These costs are usually passed on to consumers, resulting in higher retail prices. For example, if a country imposes a 25% tariff on imported steel, the price of products using that steel—like cars and appliances—will also rise. This leads to inflationary pressures in the economy, affecting not just goods that are directly subject to tariffs, but potentially many related products as well.

    Impact on Domestic Markets

    Tariffs are often implemented to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. In the short term, this can benefit local producers, allowing them to maintain or increase their market share as consumers seek alternatives to more expensive imported goods. However, this protection can also lead to complacency among domestic producers, reducing their incentive to innovate or improve efficiency. Over time, failing to compete with foreign manufacturers can hinder the growth of a country’s industry.

    Additionally, while some sectors may thrive due to tariffs, others may suffer. Industries that rely on imported raw materials may see their costs rise, leading to higher production costs and reduced competitiveness. This creates a complex dance of winners and losers in the domestic market.

    In summary, Trump’s proposed tariffs will increase costs for the very people he vowed to help by lowering prices.

    Read more in the below article:

    We’re Economists. Here’s What We Really Think Of Trump’s Plan To ‘Lower’ Grocery Prices.