
“I Served There. And I Lost Friends There” – Prince Harry Rebukes Trump’s False NATO Claims
Blue Press Journal – When President Donald Trump took the stage at the World Economic Forum in Davos, his remarks on NATO sent shockwaves across the transatlantic alliance. Trump claimed that NATO members would not come to America’s aid if called upon — a statement that flies in the face of historical fact.
On Friday, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, delivered a pointed rebuttal rooted in lived experience. Having served two tours in Afghanistan — including a harrowing 10-week stint in Helmand province — Harry is no stranger to the realities of war.
“I served there. I made lifelong friends there. And I lost friends there,” Harry said. “In 2001, NATO invoked Article 5 for the first — and only — time in history. It meant that every allied nation was obliged to stand with the United States in Afghanistan, in pursuit of our shared security. Allies answered that call.”
The Truth About NATO’s Sacrifice
In the wake of the September 11 attacks, NATO’s collective defense principle — Article 5 — was activated for the first time since the alliance was founded in 1949. The United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, France, Poland, Denmark, and other NATO nations deployed troops alongside U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
The cost was staggering:
- United Kingdom: 457 service members killed
- Canada: 158 killed
- Germany: 59 killed
- France: 86 killed
- Poland: 44 killed
- Denmark: 43 killed
These numbers represent more than statistics — they tell stories of young lives cut short, families shattered, and nations standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the U.S. in its longest war.
Trump’s Draft-Dodging Past
Trump’s dismissal of NATO’s contributions is even more striking given his own history. While tens of thousands of Americans served — and thousands died — in Vietnam, Trump avoided the draft five times: four student deferments and one medical deferment for alleged bone spurs.
For someone who never wore the uniform to question the loyalty and sacrifice of allied forces is, critics argue, both historically inaccurate and morally tone-deaf.
Why Truth Matters in Diplomacy
Prince Harry’s words resonate not only because of his royal status, but because of his credibility as a veteran. His reminder is clear: diplomacy and military alliances are built on trust, truth, and shared sacrifice.
When leaders distort history, they undermine the very alliances that have safeguarded global stability for decades. NATO’s solidarity after 9/11 was real, and it came at a heavy human cost.
Harry’s closing reflection serves as a warning:
“Those sacrifices deserve to be spoken about truthfully and with respect, as we all remain united and loyal to the defense of diplomacy and peace.”
In an era of rising geopolitical tension, remembering the truth about NATO’s commitment is not just good history — it’s essential for the future of global security.
Leave a comment